Website Building

Website Performance Statistics: Speed and Page Weight

Explore verified website performance statistics from the 2025 Web Almanac. Compare mobile and desktop Core Web Vitals, page weight and image bytes with source context and a downloadable data table.

Last updated: Last verified:
Download the data (CSV) ↗8 source-checked findings

Mobile sites with good Core Web Vitals, 2021–2025

202132%
202231%
202336%
202444%
202548%
Share of mobile origins with good Core Web Vitals in the Web Almanac performance chapter. The trend does not isolate the effect of any one optimization.

The statistics at a glance

Swipe the table to see each value, year and original source.

Website Performance Statistics: Speed and Page Weight: values, reporting years and original sources.
StatisticValueYearSource
#01Mobile sites with good Core Web Vitals in 2021Share of mobile origins classified as good across Core Web Vitals in the historical trend chart; 2021 is the measurement year.32%2021HTTP Archive, 2025 Web Almanac: Performance, figure 7.1 ↗
#02Mobile sites with good Core Web Vitals in 2022Share of mobile origins classified as good across Core Web Vitals in the historical trend chart.31%2022HTTP Archive, 2025 Web Almanac: Performance, figure 7.1 ↗
#03Mobile sites with good Core Web Vitals in 2023Share of mobile origins classified as good across Core Web Vitals in the historical trend chart.36%2023HTTP Archive, 2025 Web Almanac: Performance, figure 7.1 ↗
#04Mobile sites with good Core Web Vitals in 2024Share of mobile origins classified as good across Core Web Vitals in the historical trend chart.44%2024HTTP Archive, 2025 Web Almanac: Performance, figure 7.1 ↗
#05Mobile sites with good Core Web Vitals in 2025Share of mobile origins with good Core Web Vitals; analysis uses Chrome UX Report field data and HTTP Archive measurements.48%2025HTTP Archive, 2025 Web Almanac: Performance, figure 7.1 ↗
#06Desktop sites with good Core Web Vitals in 2025Desktop-origin share with good Core Web Vitals; compare with 48% mobile in the same chapter and year.56%2025HTTP Archive, 2025 Web Almanac: Performance, figure 7.1 ↗
#07Median mobile home page transfer size in July 2025Median transferred bytes for mobile home pages in the July 2025 crawl; this is an observation, not a recommended page-size target.2,559 KB2025HTTP Archive, 2025 Web Almanac: Page Weight, figure 14.7 ↗
#08Median image bytes on mobile home pages in July 2025Image portion of median mobile home-page transfer size in the July 2025 HTTP Archive crawl.911 KB2025HTTP Archive, 2025 Web Almanac: Page Weight, figure 14.5 ↗

What the numbers say

The web is getting faster in one important measure, while its pages keep growing. In the 2025 Web Almanac performance analysis, 48% of mobile sites had good Core Web Vitals, up from 32% in 2021. Desktop reached 56% in 2025. These are shares of observed sites with field-data coverage, not a promise that every visitor had a fast experience.

The other side of the story is weight. The Page Weight chapter puts the median mobile home page at 2,559 KB in July 2025. Images accounted for 911 KB. Removing every image will not automatically make a site fast: network conditions, JavaScript work, server response, and layout behavior matter too. It does tell a team where to inspect first when an image-heavy page feels slow.

How to use these figures

Use the Core Web Vitals trend to explain the state of the web, then measure your own visitors before choosing fixes. The Almanac combines the HTTP Archive crawl with Chrome UX Report field data. Its methodology explains the July 2025 crawl and why field-data coverage is not identical to the full crawl population. The trend does not establish that one design practice caused the improvement.

For a new site, write a performance budget before launch. Set an image-size target, test the main templates on a mid-range phone, and check real-user Core Web Vitals once traffic allows it. Start with the pages that lead to a contact request or sale. A fast homepage will not rescue a slow checkout.

The 48% mobile versus 56% desktop gap is a planning reminder. Review on the devices your audience uses. Desktop lab tests alone miss much of the mobile experience.

These figures are cross-site benchmarks. They do not measure Online Marketing HQ clients, prove a conversion lift from a faster page, or establish a universal target of 2,559 KB. The page-weight figure is a median observed size, not a recommendation. Consult the original performance chapter for definitions and the underlying charts before quoting a comparison.

For practical next steps, read our guide to planning a first website, SEO foundations for new websites, and website building topic hub.

MAKE YOUR SOURCES EASY TO TRACE

How to cite this page

Choose a format and copy the reference. For numerical claims, always check the original linked source.

Online Marketing HQ. (2026, October 23). Website Performance Statistics: Speed and Page Weight. https://onlinemarketinghq.co/stats/website-building-statistics

Chat on WhatsApp